How to Scrape YouTube Data using Python in 2026

**TL;DR**

Scraping YouTube data with Python is still possible in 2025, but it looks very different from a few years ago. Static HTML scraping works only in limited cases. Pages are dynamic, layouts change often, and anti bot measures are more aggressive. This guide walks through how YouTube pages are structured, what data you can realistically extract, where basic scripts break, and how to think about scraping YouTube data safely and sustainably. The Python example is kept simple, but the real value is in understanding the moving parts behind it. If you want data that survives layout changes and scale, you will need more than a single script.

An Introduction to Web Scraping with Python

YouTube is not just a video platform anymore. It is a massive data source.

Every video page carries signals about audience interest, creator momentum, content performance, and topic demand. Views, likes, channel growth, hashtags, upload cadence, and engagement velocity all tell a story. When collected over time, that story becomes useful for creators, marketers, analysts, and product teams.

That usefulness is exactly why people try to scrape YouTube.

The challenge is that YouTube was never designed to be scraped casually. Pages are dynamic. Elements shift. Data loads asynchronously. The same video can look different depending on region, device, or login state. A script that works today may quietly fail tomorrow.

This article refreshes an older approach to scraping YouTube data using Python and places it in a 2025 context.

We will start with why people scrape YouTube data and what kinds of questions it helps answer. Then we will look at a simple Python-based extractor and explain what it does, what it misses, and where it becomes fragile. Along the way, we will talk about realistic limitations, common mistakes, and how experienced teams think about scraping YouTube at scale.

This is not about gaming the platform. It is about understanding what data exists, how it is exposed on the page, and what it takes to extract it responsibly.

When you are ready, say next, and I’ll continue with Why scrape data from YouTube in 2026.

Why scrape data from YouTube in 2026

People scraped YouTube data a decade ago to answer simple questions. Which videos are popular? How many views did something get? Who has the biggest channel?

Those questions still matter, but the reasons have evolved.

In 2026, YouTube data is less about vanity metrics and more about patterns. Teams are trying to understand momentum, not just totals. Direction, not snapshots. Change over time, not one-off numbers.

Here are the most common and practical reasons teams still scrape YouTube data today.

Identifying high-performing keyword patterns

Search on YouTube works very differently from web search. Titles, descriptions, and viewer behavior all influence visibility.

By collecting data from top-ranking videos for a specific topic, you can see which words repeatedly appear in titles, how long those titles are, and how engagement compares across variations. Over time, this reveals keyword patterns that consistently attract clicks and watch time.

This is less about copying titles and more about understanding what audiences respond to in a given niche.

Comparing hashtag performance in context

Hashtags on YouTube are subtle but influential. They help with discoverability, but not all hashtags perform the same way across topics.

By scraping videos that use similar hashtags and comparing views, likes, and upload timing, you can see which tags correlate with sustained engagement versus short spikes. This is especially useful for creators and agencies managing multiple channels.

The key is context. A hashtag that works for music videos may fail for tutorials or product reviews.

Tracking channel momentum, not just size

Subscriber count alone does not tell you whether a channel is growing, slowing down, or plateauing.

By scraping newly uploaded videos from a channel at regular intervals, you can track how views and likes accumulate over time. This helps identify whether engagement velocity is improving or declining, even if subscriber numbers look stable.

For analysts and brands evaluating creator partnerships, this is often more valuable than raw subscriber totals.

Understanding topic saturation and audience fatigue

When many channels publish similar content, scraping helps reveal saturation.

If dozens of videos on the same topic show declining engagement despite high production quality, it may indicate audience fatigue. On the other hand, rising engagement across multiple channels can signal an emerging trend worth investing in.

This kind of insight only appears when you look across videos, channels, and time together.

Building time series engagement data

Single data pulls are rarely useful. The real value comes from collecting the same data points repeatedly.

Scraping likes, views, and comments at fixed intervals allows you to build time series graphs. These reveal patterns like delayed virality, sudden drops, or long tail growth that are invisible in static snapshots.

In practice, this is where most simple scripts fall short. Scheduling, monitoring, and handling failures become as important as the extraction logic itself.

In the next section, we will move from the why to the how and look at a basic Python approach to scraping YouTube video data, along with the assumptions baked into it.

Getting started with a basic Python scraper

Before jumping into code, it is important to reset expectations.

The original script you saw earlier was written for a time when YouTube pages were far more static. In 2025, most YouTube pages rely heavily on JavaScript, dynamic rendering, and structured data blobs that are injected after the initial page load.

That said, a simple Python scraper is still useful for learning how data is exposed on a YouTube video page and for small-scale experimentation.

The goal of this section is not to present a production-ready solution. It is to help you understand where YouTube data lives, how Python can access it, and why this approach eventually breaks down.

What this approach actually does

At a high level, the script follows four steps.

First, it sends a request to a YouTube video URL while pretending to be a regular browser. This avoids being blocked immediately by basic user agent checks.

Second, it downloads the raw HTML returned by the server.

Third, it parses that HTML using BeautifulSoup so individual elements can be searched and extracted.

Finally, it writes the extracted data into a structured JSON file.

This works only when the data you want is present in the initial HTML response. Anything loaded dynamically after page load will not appear unless additional steps are taken.

Minimal setup and assumptions

This approach assumes:

• You are scraping individual video URLs, not search results or feeds
• You are working at very small scale
• You are comfortable with fragile selectors that may change
• You are using this for learning or internal analysis

It also assumes you already have Python installed and are familiar with installing libraries like BeautifulSoup.

The core Python logic, simplified

Here is a trimmed and modernized version of the original logic, shown only to explain the flow.

from urllib.request import Request, urlopen

from bs4 import BeautifulSoup

import json

url = input(“Enter YouTube video URL: “)

req = Request(url, headers={“User-Agent”: “Mozilla/5.0”})

html = urlopen(req).read()

soup = BeautifulSoup(html, “html.parser”)

data = {}

title = soup.find(“span”, {“class”: “watch-title”})

if title:

    data[“title”] = title.text.strip()

views = soup.find(“div”, {“class”: “watch-view-count”})

if views:

    data[“views”] = views.text.strip()

with open(“data.json”, “w”, encoding=”utf-8″) as f:

    json.dump(data, f, indent=2)

This snippet intentionally avoids trying to extract everything. It highlights the basic pattern used throughout the full script.

Request the page.
Parse the HTML.
Search for known elements.
Store results.

Where this starts to fail

In practice, several things can go wrong quickly.

YouTube frequently changes class names. Elements like likes and dislikes are often rendered dynamically. Subscriber counts may be hidden behind client-side scripts. Hashtags may not appear at all in the static HTML.

Even when the script runs without errors, it may silently return incomplete or outdated data. This is more dangerous than a hard failure because it looks correct at first glance.

That is why experienced teams rarely rely on one-off scripts without monitoring or validation.

In the next section, we will break down the original YouTube crawler code in detail and explain exactly which parts map to which data points, and why some of them are inherently unstable.

The YouTube crawler code explained

Let’s unpack what the original script is trying to do, line by line, but in a way that matches how YouTube behaves today.

The important idea is this: the script is not “scraping YouTube” broadly. It is scraping a single HTML response and hoping the values you care about are already inside it.

Sometimes they are. Often they are not.

Step 1: Fetch the page like a browser

The script sets a browser-like User Agent and downloads the HTML.

Why this matters in 2025:

• If you send a plain Python request, you are more likely to get blocked, throttled, or served a consent page.
• Even when you get a response, it might be a different layout depending on geography, cookies, or whether YouTube thinks you are logged in.

In other words, “it returned HTML” does not mean “it returned the same YouTube page you see in your browser.”

Step 2: Save the HTML locally

The script writes an output_file.html to disk. This is one of the best parts of the old workflow and it is still the right move.

When scraping fails, the fastest way to debug is to open the saved HTML and confirm:

• Did you get the real video page, or a consent screen
• Did you get a bot challenge
• Did you get a lightweight HTML shell with no meaningful data

If the HTML you saved does not contain the data, BeautifulSoup cannot magically extract it.

Step 3: Extract fields using BeautifulSoup selectors

This is where the script makes a set of assumptions about which HTML elements contain each value.

Here is the mapping from the original approach, plus what you should know about it now.

Data point	What the script looks for	Reality in 2025
Title	span.watch-title	Often not present as-is. The title is typically available in structured data or injected JSON, not as a stable span class.
Channel name	script[type=”application/ld+json”] then reads a nested path	This is one of the more reliable ideas. Structured data exists on many pages, but the structure can vary and can be incomplete.
Views	div. watch-view-count	Frequently dynamic. Sometimes present, sometimes not. Can also appear in an embedded JSON state rather than a visible div.
Likes, dislikes	buttons with titles like “I like this.”	Very fragile. YouTube has changed how likes are displayed many times. Dislike counts are not consistently available publicly.
Subscriber count	a long class string on a span	Extremely fragile. Subscriber counts can be abbreviated, hidden, or loaded asynchronously.
Hashtags	span and a-tags with older YouTube classes	These selectors are dated. Hashtags may be present in the description area, in metadata, or not present at all.

The key takeaway is not “these selectors are wrong.” The takeaway is that scraping YouTube by CSS class names is a short-lived strategy.

You can make it work today. You cannot trust it next month without monitoring.

Step 4: Write a JSON output

The script writes data.json in your current directory. This is the right output format because it forces you to think in structured fields.

But in 2026, you also want to store validation signals alongside the data, so you can detect silent failures.

Two practical examples:

• Save the HTTP status code and final URL, so you can detect redirects to consent pages.
• Save a boolean like is_video_page that checks for a small fingerprint string you expect on real video pages.

You do not need heavy code for this. You just need a habit of treating extraction as “data plus confidence.”

A simple way to make the extraction less brittle

Even if you stay with BeautifulSoup, the biggest upgrade is to stop depending on exact class names wherever possible.

Instead, prefer:

• Structured data blocks where available
• JSON state embedded in the page source
• Text patterns that are less likely to be renamed than CSS classes

We will get into this carefully in the next section, because it connects directly to the question people ask right after trying the old script:

Why it works for some videos and fails for others in 2026

If you run the old script on ten video URLs, you will usually see three outcomes:

1. It extracts a few fields correctly.
2. It extracts nothing for some fields, but still writes a JSON, which looks like success.
3. It extracts garbage, because you scraped a consent page or a bot interstitial instead of the video.

That inconsistency is not random. It comes from a handful of predictable failure modes that show up constantly with YouTube in 2025.

Failure mode 1: You scraped the wrong page

This is the most common one.

Your request got redirected to a consent screen, an age gate, a region-restricted version, or a lightweight “shell” page that expects JavaScript to fill in the real content. The script still parses HTML, so it does not crash. It just cannot find the elements you expect.

What to change first

• Always check the final URL after the request.
• Add a simple “page fingerprint” check before extracting fields.

A practical fingerprint could be as simple as checking if the page contains something that only real video pages contain, like a structured data block or a known JSON key.

Failure mode 2: The data is not in the initial HTML

YouTube pages often load key values after the first response. So the HTML you download contains placeholders, not the data. Likes and subscriber counts are frequent victims here. Hashtags are another.

What to change first

• Stop relying on visible DOM elements for key metrics.
• Prefer extracting from embedded JSON or structured data when possible, because those are more stable sources than CSS class selectors.

Failure mode 3: Layout differences based on geography, device, or login state

YouTube can serve different HTML for:

• Mobile vs desktop
• Logged in vs logged out
• Different countries
• Different languages

Even the same URL can change its structure depending on headers and cookies.

What to change first

• Set an Accept Language header consistently.
• Use one predictable request profile so your scraper does not see a different layout every run.

Failure mode 4: Your selectors are outdated or too specific

Classes like watch-title and watch-view-count are from an older YouTube layout. Modern YouTube often uses dynamically generated class names that are not meant to be stable identifiers.

What to change first

• Replace “exact class match” selectors with more resilient strategies.
• Look for data in structured sources first, then use DOM scraping as a fallback.

Failure mode 5: Rate limiting and bot detection

If you scrape too fast or from one IP, you start getting throttled responses, partial pages, or outright blocks.

This can look like random failures unless you log response codes and content length.

What to change first

• Log status codes, response size, and timing.
• Add delays and retries with backoff.
• Rotate IPs only when you actually need to, because rotating without hygiene can make things worse.

Failure mode 6: Dislike counts are not consistently available

This one is important because the original article treats dislikes as a normal field.

In 2025, public dislike counts are not reliably exposed on standard YouTube pages. Sometimes you might see them via older cached layouts, third party layers, or specific contexts, but you should not build a scraper that assumes dislikes are always extractable.

What to change first

• Treat dislikes as optional and unstable.
• If your use case needs dislike signals, define an alternate metric upfront, like like to view ratio or comment velocity.

The first three upgrades that give you the biggest reliability jump

If you only do three things before touching anything else, do these:

1. Add a page validity check
   Confirm you scraped a real video page before extracting fields.
2. Extract from structured data or embedded JSON first
   Use DOM selectors only as a fallback.
3. Add basic observability
   Log status code, final URL, response length, and which fields were found.

These changes turn scraping from “hope it worked” into “we know when it worked.”

In the next section, we will modernize the extraction approach by pulling the title, channel, and view signals from more stable sources. Still in Python, still simple, but far less fragile than class name scraping.

Building a reliable YouTube data pipeline in 2026

Scraping YouTube is easy to start and surprisingly hard to keep stable. That is the part most tutorials skip, and it is why teams get frustrated after their first “working” script.

A simple Python script that downloads HTML and parses it with BeautifulSoup can teach you where data shows up and how extraction works. It is also a decent way to validate a small list of URLs, especially if you are doing a one-time research pull.

But once you move from ten URLs to ten thousand, or from one run to a daily job, the real problems show up. You stop dealing with code bugs, and you start dealing with page variance. Consent pages. Region-based layouts. JavaScript rendered fields. Rate limits. Bot challenges. Quiet changes in markup that do not break your script, but quietly zero out half your fields.

If you take only one lesson from this refresh, it should be this: treat scraping as a data pipeline, not a script.

A pipeline has checks. It has logging. It has fallbacks. It knows when it failed and why. It can tell you the difference between “no hashtags on this video” and “we scraped a consent page again.” It can detect a layout shift before your dashboard is full of blanks.

That mindset also makes your data more useful. When you capture YouTube metrics over time, the value comes from trends and velocity, not a single snapshot. Views over 24 hours. Like to view ratios over a week. Channel momentum across uploads. Those insights depend on consistency, and consistency depends on reliability.

So yes, start with Python. Keep it minimal. Save the HTML. Extract a few fields. Write JSON. That is the right learning path.

Then upgrade the parts that matter: verify the page, extract from structured sources first, add monitoring, and design for change. YouTube will keep evolving. Your approach has to assume that, or you will be rebuilding the same scraper every few weeks.

If you want to explore more…

• Read about resilient pipelines in scalable web scraping architecture
• Handle blocks and geo variance with proxy rotation at scale for global crawling
• Keep scrapers stable using web crawler monitoring for reliable scraping
• Reduce risk with web scraping compliance and data quality for AI
• To know more, you can use the official reference for structured access and quota rules in the YouTube Data API documentation.

FAQs

Sharing is caring!